Muslim Refugees – the Invasion

Since I will not have new content for another week or two, to keep the blog relevant in light of 11/13/2015 Paris Terrorist Attack, I bumped this particular blog to the top, temporarily.

According to the UN, 51% of the 411,567 that have entered the Europe as refugees to date have papers from Syria.[1] Germany alone is expected to accept 800,000 refugees this year.[2] This is a far cry from Europe accepting 8,000 asylum in 2011 to 56,000 in 2013 and 150,000 in 2014[3]

In the United States the White House announced it will accept 10,000 Syrian refugees, and the House Democrats have made a written request to the White House to accept another 200,000 refugees, 100,000 of which have Syrian documentation.[4] Obama has a list of 190 cities that the refugees will be distributed to.[5] This is of course on top of the 250,000 Muslim migrants already admitted to the United States, annually.[6]

However fake Syrian documentation is being produced, and thought to be essential to be granted asylum. In Bulgaria, 10,000 fake Syrian passports were seized recently.[7] It’s safe to assume that Syrian documentation is being sold, but to who? According to data from the U.N., 75% of the immigrants who were given asylum in European nations are men, while only 13% are children and a mere 12% are women.[1] Whether this is a full scale invasion, the infamous “lone wolf” inspired terrorists by Islam sprinkled among refugees, or mostly Muslims refugees wanting a better life, here’s what to expect.

It’s hard to say how many of the refugees in Europe, but I heard five in six are Muslim. Considering many Muslims are falsely converting to Christianity to better their chances of being accepted in Western Countries, I think the number is a little higher. But as a conservative estimate, say 80% of the refugees are Muslim.

Considering Germany plans to take 800,000 and 411,000 have already been accepted, there’s going to be at least one million refugees taken in the Europe this year. This means 800,000 are Muslims. Since the U.S. accepts 250,000 Muslims every year and plans to possibly take in another 200,000 that means there will be up to 450,000 new Muslims in the U.S.

According to Daniel Pipes, 10%-15% of Muslims are Islamists, Muslims who seek implementation of Sharia Law.[8] As a reminder, Sharia Law is gamblers and drinkers should be whipped; wives should be beat for disobedience; eye for an eye judicial system; thieves get their hands chopped off; highway robbers crucified; homosexuals get executed; people who cheat on their spouses get stoned to death; critics of Islam must be put to death; those who leave Islam get killed; everyone else must engage in a Jihad.[9]

In 2015 Europe will be accepting 80,000 to 120,000 Islamists and the United States will accept 25,000 to 68,000. It’s unknown how many of these will be full blown Jihadists.

The United Kingdom is the best representation of what’s to come, since they are a Western Country who’s accepted a very high percentage of Muslims over the years. 21.3 per cent of British Muslims have never worked as opposed to the 4.3% of the total UK population that have never worked. This means they have to be supported somehow, usually by some form of welfare. The UK Muslims are poorer, sicker, less likely to own their own homes and more likely to live in bad areas. Countries that accept these refugees can expect their taxpaying citizens to support these refugees based on what’s happened in Britain.[10]

Halal Meat
Muslim refugees who are expecting to receive the charity of nations who throw away Red Cross aid packages, because the food contained in them is not Halal.[11] Halal is means “permissible” in Arabic. In order to be Halal the animal must have been fed on a natural diet. The animal must be hung upside down and allowed to bleed dry, but not be unconscious. The throat must be slit with a sharp knife while the name “Allah” is pronounced during the slaughter.[12] Honestly, I don’t understand why PETA is not freaking out at halal meat. And if you’re a Christian or Jew, you REALLY shouldn’t be eating halal meat. But if I was a refugee and halal was all there was to eat, you bet I’d eat it and be grateful I had food.

Child Molestation
If Muslims take over the west, the marrying of girls as young as six, and having sex with them at nine will be socially acceptable, because that is what Muhammad did to Aisha. However, before that happens, we can look to the UK and Ireland as an example of the beginning of things to come.

Little girls are being raped and groomed to being raped by Pakistani gangs. They are taken, abused, and left hundreds of miles away from where they were picked up.[13] People who try and report this are called racists, and the media the BBC ignores it. Their leader David Cameron, the UK Prime Minister, was quoted after his stay with a Muslim family who he refers to as British Asians, “it is mainstream Britain which needs to integrate more with the British Asian {Muslim} way of life, not the other way around.” [14]

Calls To Prayer
In accordance with Sharia Law, Muslims try and pray five times a day. This adhaan, call to prayer, used to be shouted from rooftops from the minarets of mosques is now being replaced by loudspeakers that broadcast the call. When Muslims take over an area, be assured this will be blasted as loud as they want from mosques five times a day, everyday.[15]

Birth Rate
The European Union has a birth rate of 1.6 live births per woman.[16], and the United States has a birth rate of 1.9 live births per woman.[17] However Muslims have a birth rate of 3.1 live births per woman.[18]

It takes 2.1 live births per woman to sustain a society’s population.[19] Aside from the Jihad that Muslims are commanded to overtake a society, it looks like Western society doesn’t have the births to sustain its own non-Muslim population. Unless something changes, Muslims will overtake Western Society with their birthrate, and the West will become part of the Caliphate.


Continue reading

U.S. Debt Ceiling

The US Congress is currently voting to increase the debt limit, or debt ceiling, and no “evil” tea party members will be using a strategy of “shutting down” the government as a negotiation measure to help curb government spending. So if Conservatives can’t be demonized, why care? [1]

The debt ceiling, also called the debt limit, is defined as the total amount of money that the United States government is authorized to borrow to meet its existing legal obligations, including Social Security and Medicare benefits, military salaries, interest on the national debt, tax refunds, and other payments.[2]

With $18 Trillion in debt[3] and $210 Trillion in unfunded liabilities[4] the government is running out of money. When the government runs out of money and can’t print or borrow their way out of it the government as you know it will shut down, permanently! The following is a graph of our debt since the 1940s projected to the 2018.[5]

The following is a pie chart of how the US spent is money in 2013[6], which represents approximately how the US spends it’s money today.

The debt per citizen is approximately $57,000; but not all citizens pay taxes, so each taxpayer owes $154,000. Using how the Obama administration has accumulated debt, this debt is projected to increase by over $10,000 per taxpayer every year.

All this debt with no end in sight whose end might lead to the demise of the United States of America really makes you wonder if shutting down the government for sensible reforms is really “evil”, and makes you really wonder about the people who don’t pay taxes complaining about taxpayers not paying “their” fair share.

Continue reading

The American Dream

James Truslow Adams: {American Dream is} that dream of a land in which life should be better and richer and fuller for everyone, with opportunity for each according to ability or achievement. It is a difficult dream for the European upper classes to interpret adequately, and too many of us ourselves have grown weary and mistrustful of it. It is not a dream of motor cars and high wages merely, but a dream of social order in which each man and each woman shall be able to attain to the fullest stature of which they are innately capable, and be recognized by others for what they are, regardless of the fortuitous circumstances of birth or position.

James Truslow Adams coined the term “American Dream” in his 1931 book The Epic of America.

In an era of fading hope and change on steroids, leadership is eager to redefine definitions to fit their agenda. It’s time to get back to basics before the American Dream is redefined to mean Communism and Socialism.

Nothing about James Truslow Adams definition means:

• free college education for all
• open borders
• welfare for all including illegal aliens
• higher minimum wage
• gun control
• seizure of all guns
• right to abortions
• 70%-90% taxation of all people earning a living
• a living wage
• a classless society run by a big government
• crony capitalism
• environmentalism over people
• green energy
• climate change
• free healthcare for all
• accepting foreign and domestic laws above the US Constitution

The list goes on and on. And I could quite literally write a book on the quotes people have made about the American Dream and how it conflicts with the coined term. Perhaps it’s time for America to take a moment to reflect upon James Truslow Adams’ definition of the American Dream; and when presented with another quote about the American Dream in the context of fitting with an agenda, America should go back to the original quote and see if the agenda fits the American Dream. If it doesn’t disregard and fight the agenda. This is the American Dream, and no one should take it away from citizens of the United States of America.

Illegal Aliens Voting in California

A nation of laws versus a nation of men means that the nation generally adheres to the laws that have been established over the whims of what the people in the nation decide as justice. I don’t think any nation is pure enough to be 100% a nation of laws, but it seems that America was as close as it got in the past. This is slowly eroding as existing laws are being ignored; many court rulings pervert the initial intent of the existing law; and some laws are created that undermine the US Constitution and the spirit of America.

Every state has a voter registration process to allow citizens to register to vote. All states allow this through the Voter’s Registration office in person, by mail or and many states offer registering online. Most if not all states allow the voter the option to register via Department of Motor Vehicles. California currently allows all these options to potential voters.[1] It’s quite literally, easier for a voter to register in this day and age than ever before.

The current requirements to register to vote in California are being[1]:

• A United States citizen,
• A resident of California,
• 18 years of age or older on Election Day,
• Not found mentally incompetent by a court of law, and
• Not currently imprisoned or on parole for the conviction of a felony

Governor of California just signed a Assembly Bill 1461, the New Motor Voter Act, which for the first time in the history of the United States history will automatically register people to vote through the Department of Motor Vehicles when they renew or secure a driver’s license.[2]

In California among likely voters in 2015, 43% are Democrats, 32% are Republicans, 20% are independents, and 5% are registered with other parties. However among unregistered voters this number is 49% lean toward the Democratic Party and 22% toward the Republican Party; 29% lean toward neither party or are unsure.[3] Clearly, if everyone is able to vote by mandatory registration and votes, this gives the Democratic Party an edge. The fact bill AB 1461 was signed by a Democratic Governor is no coincidence.

In California to obtain the “original” driver’s license requires the standard process which is mostly providing proof of competency, a thumb print, application, and a social security number.[4] However after viewing the sample application on the website it’s clear that an “original” license can be obtained without a social security number. This is because Section 3 states that if you’ve never been issued a social security number, you can sign and date it under penalty of perjury according to Vehicle code 12801, and a license can be issued.[5] After looking at Vehicle code 12801.9, California accepts so many easily forged documents, that really obtaining an original license would be extremely easy for someone prone to break law, someone like an illegal alien who already went to great lengths to break the law to be here to begin with.[6]

Since January 2, 2015, the “honest” illegal alien in California can be issued special driver’s license regardless of immigration status, because of AB 60 Bill Governor Brown signed into law in 2013. It’s stated that this driver’s license is also used as a form of identification, which for most purposes the license must not be discriminated between a “original” license.[7]

If there aren’t stringent measures taken, there are many who express concerns that it’s possible that illegal aliens would be registered to vote automatically. Quite frankly an illegal alien, who provides forged documentation to obtain an “original” driver’s license who would not normally add additional risk of being caught by registering to vote, would be automatically thrown into the voting pool. They probably wouldn’t “opt out”, because that would draw attention to themselves by creating additional paperwork. In fact illegal aliens may feel more emboldened, because the fact that they’re here and “entitled” to most benefits citizens get without discrimination would make them feel like they have a right to have a say in who gets elected. With mandatory voter registration and the likelihood of illegal aliens voting, until our government is overthrown by these people, the Democrats win.

Continue reading

USA Civics – Gun Control

President Obama: Citizenship means standing up for the lives that gun violence steals from us each day.

President Obama often stated during the 2008 election cycle that he was a “constitutional law professor” at Columbia University. In July 2015 President Obama intended to sign an Executive Order seizing the guns of 4.2 million Social Security recipients who have their money managed by “representative payees”[1], which would be the largest gun grab to date. As a result the Umpqua Community College shooting at Roseburg, Oregon on October 1, 2015 the White House is preparing for more Executive Orders on Gun Control.[2]

President Obama cannot get his radical gun control laws passed through Congress, so he’s using Executive Orders to make laws, which is not part of his powers designated by the US Constitution. To be fair, many on the left feel that since the US Constitution over 200 years old and technology has advanced so much the US Constitution is no longer relevant.

Civics is defined by Merriam-Webster as “the study of the rights and duties of citizens and of how government works.”[3] I took a civics course in High School and US Government Courses in college. I learned a lot about what it means to be a citizen and gun control wasn’t part of anything I learned about citizenship.

I did learn there are three equal branches of government. In short US Congress makes the laws; the Supreme Court interprets the laws; and the Executive Branch enacts the laws. Much of the particular power requirements of the country have been divided by the US Constitution to give enough checks and balances to help avoid one branch become too powerful. The founding fathers fought the American Revolution and designed the government that wasn’t an oligarchy, but a democratic Republic.

Bill O’Reilly adapted a citizenship quiz from the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. Take it and see if you get 15 to pass, because that’s a requirement of getting citizenship in the United States of America – CLICK HERE [4] None of these questions in the link had anything about gun control.

Rahm Emanuel: Never let a good crisis go to waste.

Never letting a good crisis go to waste is the driving force behind the Obama regime. Rahm Emanuel is President Obama’s former White House Chief of Staff who is now the Mayor of Chicago, Illinois since elected in 2011. In 2013 Illinois is the only state that didn’t allow private citizens to carry in public. In Chicago there are no gun ranges and there’s bans on both assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. In fact before 2010 there was no gun shops, until the United States Supreme Court stepped ruled that was too radical.[5] In 2013 Chicago also passed New York City for the title “Murder Capital of the U.S.”[6]

To stop the influx of illegal guns, gun control proponents want to nationalize gun control. However the United States is not enforcing our borders the guns will hit the black market no matter if they come from the US or not and the problem will remain. As devastating as mass murders at schools are the vast majority of guns used in crimes are by criminals and gang members that obtain guns via the black market, which will NEVER cease to exist. Therefore gun laws should enable responsible gun owners to become more proficient and safer, because the first line of defense against a crime does not usually involve a law enforcement officer.


Continue reading